Use case · Close Coverage Gaps
You bought the tools. Now get everything you paid for.
A full asset inventory and a security coverage analysis for every asset in it. Read-only API access. No agent, no proxy, no appliance, nothing installed on a single machine.
Answering the questions your individual dashboards can't.
What Shadow IT exists
One asset list from the tools you already run, checked against every control you expect to find: endpoint, vulnerability, device management, cloud and identity.
- The assets no tool manages at all. Devices that show up in network, DNS or sign-in activity and in no management console — nobody owns them, which is why they're still there.
- A list, not a percentage. The actual machines missing the actual control, ready to assign and export.
- A denominator you can defend. Controls that can't run on a device aren't counted against you, and if a feed goes quiet you'll know before the number does.
What you're paying for twice
Stacks accumulate. Two EDRs after an acquisition, a scanner nobody ever retired, a firewall per business unit. See the overlap you can remove.
- Two products, one job. Where two tools in the same category are both live, with the machines each one holds and the ones running both at once.
- How far the migration actually got. "We're moving off that one" is easy to say. This shows how much of the environment each product still holds.
- A neutral referee before the renewal. A product that uniquely covers 400 machines is a different negotiation from one that duplicates another everywhere. KeyCaliber reads every tool and sells you none of them.
What to fix now
Turn a thousand uncovered devices into a plan. Gaps arrive ranked by what the affected system is worth, so the work starts where the damage would be worst.
- Impact first, not alphabetical. Missing endpoint protection on the payroll system is not the same finding as missing it on a spare test box.
- Priced by risk removed. Every recommendation carries the risk it actually takes off the board, so the order survives a budget meeting.
- Evidence when someone asks. Board, cyber-insurer, auditor, regulator — one number, the same in every room, with the working underneath it.
Three tools at 92% is not 92% covered.
Each console reports its own number and each one is telling the truth. The gaps don't overlap, so the real figure is lower than any of them — and nobody owns the machines in the middle.
Three tools averaging 92% describe an environment that is 84% actually covered — and 190 machines nobody is watching at all.
Illustrative figures
Your tools know some of this. They just aren't telling each other.
Connect two or three of the tools you already run, read-only, and get your own gap list.
Request a demo